![]() I agree, if money is tight then stick with TriAtlas. There's been a lot of discussion about it on Cloudy Nights where purchasers appear happy both with delivery and product. Hipparchos etc), but the format and labelling is quite different. As far as I can tell, Great Atlas uses the same data-set as TriAtlas (i.e. A solution would be to print TriAtlas on A3 (42x29.7mm), but for the time and expense involved, I'd rather have it ready-made on glossy paper with larger charts (61x43cm, at a scale of 35mm per degree). But TriAtlas on A4 is a pain to read upside-down with a red-light, having small labels and fields that are often quite cluttered. I find that Uranometria doesn't go deep enough to get me to the exact position of faint objects: I need the depth of TriAtlas (e.g. I currently use Uranometria and TriAtlas C (the latter printed on A4 down to my horizon - about 400 sheets in a ring binder). I've placed an order for the Great Atlas Of The Sky and will let you know what I think when I get it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |